Aller au contenu
Commencer

Workspace · PTA

Plan–Teach–Assess. Not a parent-teacher association.

PTA is Kurasa’s teacher operating model, inside a school workspace. Every allocated class and learning area is supposed to move through those three steps against the curriculum, then loop again.

A teacher writes into a scheme of work at a staffroom table before school.
A teacher writes into a scheme of work at a staffroom table before school.

Why the model exists

A continuous cycle, not plan in a book and exam at the end.

Competency-based curricula — Kenya CBC, Ghana CCP, Rwanda CBC — expect teachers to plan against official strands, teach with learner-centred activities, and capture skills evidence during or right after the lesson.

Kurasa’s claim is that planning informs teaching, teaching informs assessment, and assessment informs the next plan. PTA is how that claim is measured. The unit of work is not “a subject for the year.” It is one teacher × one class × one learning area, broken down to substrand, then indicator.

Curriculum grain

This is the backbone. PTA does not invent coverage.

Expected indicators come from the official curriculum for that grade and subject. A substrand is complete only when every expected indicator in it has a closed formative batch. Lesson plans alone cannot complete it.

  1. Learning area The subject.
  2. Strand A major curriculum block.
  3. Substrand The card a teacher works week by week.
  4. Indicators This is what “assessed” means.

Next lesson and support sit after Assess. Learners who scored 2 or below on the latest result need support — that is an action list, not a pass/fail exam.

The three pillars

Plan. Teach. Assess.

Plan

The teacher writes a CBC-aligned lesson plan for a scheduled class. A complete plan is not free text: learning area, strand, substrand, outcomes, competencies, experiences, lesson development, resources, a planned assessment method, and a reflection.

Plans can be segmented — timed chunks with teacher notes, learner activity, key questions, and an assessment prompt. That structure is what Teach mode later walks through. Above the lesson sits the scheme of work. PTA reporting itself is lesson-grain, not scheme-grain.

A saved plan with a start time counts as planned. Schemes are not a substitute for plans.

Lesson planning in Workspace

Teach

Planning is not delivery. Teach means the teacher actually ran the lesson in Teach mode: started from the plan, walked the segments with a timer, logged time spent, and completed the session — including whether objectives were met, a reflection, and follow-up.

Only completed sessions count. Delivery completion rate is completed sessions divided by scheduled plans. A plan with no completed session is the core Teach failure: planned but not delivered.

Attendance is adjacent — the class happened, who was present — but it is not a PTA pillar. PTA Teach is lesson fidelity, not roll call.

Assess

Assess means formative evidence against curriculum indicators, captured as a closed batch for the class. Pick learning area → strand → substrand → indicator. Load the class list. Score each learner on the rubric (commonly 1–4: below, approaching, meets, exceeds). Submit. That closes a batch.

Batches can be linked to the lesson plan and the delivery session. That is the closed loop: this lesson produced this evidence. Draft or unsubmitted assessments do not count. Summative tests sit beside PTA; PTA Assess is continuous classroom formative work.

Formative assessment in Workspace

A teacher week

For each allocated class and subject.

Plan the week

Write lessons against the substrands still open.

Teach them

Run the session. Do not only file the plan.

Assess the indicators

Often from inside the lesson, or immediately after.

Use the results

Learners below the bar get support. Weak indicators get re-taught. Complete substrands drop off the backlog.

The classroom Plan–Teach–Assess Tracker (Classroom → Progress) is the teacher and HOD view of that loop. It is scoped to one teacher, one subject, and a date range — term by default. It needs subject allocations; with none, there is no PTA view.

On a substrand card What it means
Plan Lesson plans created for that substrand.
Teach Completed delivery sessions.
Assess Indicators covered versus expected.
Coverage Indicators covered ÷ indicators expected.

Not started

No plans, no deliveries, no indicators.

In progress

Any PTA activity, coverage still under 100%.

Complete

Every expected indicator in the substrand has a closed formative batch.

Overall progress for the subject is indicators covered ÷ indicators expected — not “lessons filed.” A teacher can look busy on Plan and still be incomplete on Assess.

School leaders

The same model, at school scale.

Admins get a PTA Command Centre: a school-level Plan–Teach–Assess pulse for the current academic year’s classes. Did we plan? Did we actually teach? Did we assess the curriculum? Did learners meet the bar?

Plan Plans created ÷ expected curriculum indicators, capped at 100. Planning volume versus syllabus size.
Teach Delivery completion rate. Fidelity: planned lessons that were taught.
Assess Distinct indicators assessed ÷ expected indicators. Syllabus actually evidenced.
Meet Share of scores in Meets + Exceeds. Quality of learning, not just activity.

Healthy

Teach and attainment both at 70 or above.

Watch

Either sits between 50 and 69.

Attention

Either is below 50.

The command centre surfaces missed lessons, teachers who plan but do not deliver, learners needing support, weak sections, unassessed indicator backlog, and wins — high teach with high attainment. Leaders can roll up by section, grade or class, filter by term, week or month, and export a brief for an HOD meeting.

Teacher rows are one line per teacher × class × subject: plans, deliveries, delivery rate, indicators assessed versus expected, average score.

Kurasa for schools

What PTA is careful not to mix

Coverage is not proficiency.

A class can have high Assess coverage and low attainment — everything was marked, learners are still below. The pulse shows both on purpose.

In PTA Not PTA
CBC/CCP lesson plans Schemes as a substitute for plans
Completed lesson delivery Opening a plan and never teaching it
Closed formative indicator batches Draft or unsubmitted assessments
Rubric bands and needs-support lists Summative exams as the main score
Teacher × class × subject allocations School-wide vanity counts with no allocation

In the product

Where the loop lives.

Teacher

Run the cycle.

Lesson Plans → create a CBC plan. Teach mode → run it as a timed session. Formative assessment — standalone or in-lesson quick mark. Classroom → Progress is the PTA tracker. Classroom → Formative shows who needs support and which indicators are weak.

Pour les enseignants

School leader

See whether teaching happened.

Admin → PTA Command Centre: pulse, weekly trend, comparison, risks. Delivery insights for missed lessons and formative follow-up. Teacher activity sits beside it — plans done, attendance marked, indicators assessed — related daily stats, not a fourth pillar.

Parent

Downstream of Assess.

Reports and notifications. Parents are not a PTA pillar; they consume the evidence the cycle produces.

Kurasa Workspace lesson plan for Grade 6 Mathematics, Fractions in daily life.
Kurasa Workspace lesson plan for Grade 6 Mathematics, Fractions in daily life.

In one sentence

For every allocated class and subject, plan the curriculum lesson, teach it as a recorded session, then close formative evidence on the indicators — and keep looping until substrands are complete and learners who scored 2 or below get support.

Kurasa’s Teachers PTA model

Partenaires

Start this term

PTA lives in a school workspace.

Create the account, allocate classes, and let teachers close the loop on the indicators.